Have a look at Zafesoft, as well as ArtistScope. Let me know if these fall short of what you are looking for.
I need to know what your budget is before I can recommend a possible solution or solutions. It seems that price is a main issue, however it could be that Vitrium is the right solution for you. The article does not necessarily mean that it is a bad product.
The part 2 to your question is missing so I am not sure that I will do all your questions justice.
My advice to you is invest cautiously in this industry. As you know the trends in the IT industry is moving at an unbelievable fast pace. Organisations are beginning to allow their employees to bring in their smartphones and tablets into the workplace. Some have even gone further by allowing their employees to view corporate data on their personal devices. This along with corporate data in the cloud should begin to answer the question where your money should be going. Other than this, unless your investment has a big marketing machine behind it the risk of seeing a profitable return on your investment begins to wane.
All Enterprise DRM products have limiting features that give its customers a complete satisfaction. For example I am currently working on a project that is cloud based solution but only works with one web browser and not the others, this can always lead to frustration for the client, resulting in canning the whole idea altogether.
The market opportunity is still highly untapped especially in the Apple iPhone and iPad space, Android, Windows Phone, Blackberry (currently in decline, but still big in many parts of the developing world) and other personal electronic devices. There is also the Cloud, in other words you develop solutions that will make access to confidential data stored in the cloud seamless, but the true secret to such a solution is making it seamless in terms of access to all mobile and desktop operating systems.
Regarding potential customers, I would say from a corporate perspective banks, pharmaceuticals, legal firms, publishing, oil and gas, and manufacturing are your main targets. On the whole anyone who needs to control how sensitive and confidential information is distributed. Symantec and Adobe are great products, but have very limiting capabilities and are not the market leaders in Enterprise DRM, but as I said previously there is scope for growth. I hope I have answered all your questions.
Last year some parents were questioning whether their child was denied a place in one of the selective schools in Redbridge Local Education Authority after it has been alleged that some students had practised the exact same questions a day before the day of the exams.
Many parents have called on Redbridge to investigate the source of the leaked exams, but Redbridge have denied that it is impossible for the questions to have been leaked, claiming they have a very thorough process of securing the questions before the actual exam.
Speaking to a 11 plus tutor, I was told that allegation exam leaks have been going on for over 10 years, but Redbridge have persistently denied the allegations. The integrity of the Redbridge LEA and the 11 plus selection process is at stake unless a public inquiry is undertaken to convince parents that the process is fair.
Redbridge can calm these accusations by reviewing its current processes. For example once the questions are selected from a pool of questions, the best way is to secure the questions is to have 3 sets of papers for each subject from which it will be determined at a date closer to the exams which one the papers the students will be sitting. The questions will be stored electronically and secured using enterprise rights management.
The selected papers are sent to the printer electronically, to be delivered to the exam centres on the morning of the exams by UPS or DHL with a robust backup system to cover any risks of the exam papers not getting to the centres. There are variations to the solution suggested above, and this needs to be communicated to give parents full confidence in the system.
That will be done soon, hopefully you should see some progress before the end of the year.
is there any documentation availabe where major right management systems are beeing compared to each other ? (Pros and Cons, features, systematics)
Hi Andreas, I am not sure there is anything that compares Enterprise DRM at the moment. It was a project that I was going to take on but I am yet to start.
I have not given up, its just that I am so busy till now. I intend to return to writing again. Watch this space.
If you can reach me via email, I can send you some research papers and white papers.
Watchdox seems to be a fantastic product, for what you intend to achieve, where cost is a factor I will go for Watchdox.
From what I know Haihaisoft does more in the area securing of media files rather than document security. I am not really knowleageable in this area of expertise.
So what should be an approach of creating Data Classification Policy.
Most classification schemes attempt to define the sensitivity of data using three criteria confidentiality,integrity and availability.
this leads to 3 to 4 classification like Secret,Internal,Confidentia,Public is this right approach ?
Apologies for the delayed response. Data classification has not become a standard yet, so yes you could approach classification in the manner you mentioned. But most importantly, you have to understand the types of documents that your organisation keeps and define your classification on that basis.
That is not a problem at all. You have my permission.
Your answer depends on what you want to secure and what your budget is. There are some IRM solutions that are targeted at file servers, while some are targeted specifically at content management systems. I have to know which one you are aiming to secure to answer your question.
Also what is your budget?
The company is uniquely positioned as an independent vendor of pure Enterprise Digital Rights Management products
MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. - July 11, 2011 - Based on its recent analysis of the enterprise digital rights management (EDRM) market, Frost & Sullivan recognizes Fasoo.com, Inc. with the 2011 Global Frost & Sullivan Award for Competitive Strategy Innovation of the Year. Fasoo.com (Fasoo) has successfully retained its leadership in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) markets and is seeing steady improvement in its global market position based on its unique technology, ongoing R&D improvements, comprehensive product capability and effective use of competitive intelligence.
In the global EDRM market Fasoo competes with Microsoft that has the strength of its Windows Server and Office products, which are mainstay applications for enterprises worldwide. Fasoo’s technology approach is driven by security and practical considerations. By overriding an application’s memory space, it provides a strong approach to document protection that integrates smoothly with the end-user experience even for third party applications, where EDRM vendors do not have access to the program code.
“This is a difficult approach for several reasons, including risk of performance impact and the requirement of keeping pace with application and document format updates,” said Frost & Sullivan Research Analyst Avni Rambhia. “Fasoo has developed the technical strength and deployment process to execute it well.”
Another unique Fasoo’s strength is its ability to scale operations across large enterprises, which are often a patchwork of identity management and client application systems across various enterprises. Fasoo has strong experience in securing information on an enterprise-wide level for large, globally distributed companies. For example, its flagship installation for Samsung spans more than 160,000 internal users and more than one million total users worldwide. No competitor has installations on this scale.
Today, enterprises are shifting from deploying EDRM on a need-basis to employing it uniformly for all enterprise employees. Fasoo’s strategy of combining a highly interoperable product with custom services as needed has positioned it well to organically fulfill this growing demand. In contrast, competitors have tended to focus on formats or deployment environments within their core competency, and to rely on systems integrators or value added resellers to develop and deliver an overall solution for the enterprise.
Fasoo dominates the APAC markets, notably Japan and Korea, and is now expanding into major markets such as China in the East, and North America and Europe in the West, through a combination of strategic partnerships and organic growth. Fasoo is the only major player in the EDRM market who has remained a pure EDRM vendor. While acquisition by large corporations offers competitors the strength of better sales resources and a more established customer base, Fasoo is countering this in two ways. In the North American and European markets, it is joining efforts with established channel partners such as IKON Office Solutions, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ricoh Americas Corporation, and Toshiba America Business Solutions, Inc to reach customers and win market share. Second, Fasoo is being proactively sought out as a partner by leading data loss prevention (DLP) vendors who are trying to break into the APAC region.
“Fasoo effectively articulates shortcomings in competing offerings, while highlighting its own strengths in the context of customer pain points, to craft compelling sales messaging and marketing communication,” said Rambhia. “Its blue ocean strategy is to position the company as a pure EDRM vendor with the technology that is agnostic to asset management, server software and DLP systems, but which interoperates with all market leading applications and platforms and is scalable to meet the needs of large enterprises with global footprints.”
In recognition of its innovative competitive strategies, Frost & Sullivan is proud to recognize Fasoo with the Global Frost & Sullivan Award for Competitive Strategy Innovation of the Year in the EDRM market. Each year, Frost & Sullivan presents this award to the company that has demonstrated uniqueness of strategy, leveraging competitive intelligence to improve market position.
Frost & Sullivan’s Best Practices Awards recognize companies in a variety of regional and global markets for demonstrating outstanding achievement and superior performance in areas such as leadership, technological innovation, customer service and strategic product development. Industry analysts compare market participants and measure performance through in-depth interviews, analysis and extensive secondary research in order to identify best practices in the industry.
Source: Frost & Sullivan
Should government intervene in the protection of corporate IP? This is the thought provoking question that needs to be answered in light of the recent loss of corporate IP mainly to emerging economies like China? Is the government a stakeholder when IP is lost or stolen?
From a government perspective there are numerous issues that happen when a company looses its IP to a foreign competitor. To name a few an obvious impact on government is the loss of revenue in the form of taxes that can be directly or indirectly linked to that IP. Another impact for government is the unemployment benefits that have to be paid as a result of loss in revenue.
In the UK small businesses form almost 80% of the economy and a considerable number gain their competitive edge through intellectual property rights and trade secrets. Considering the impact these businesses have on the economy as a whole, tax breaks should be given to these businesses to enable them invest in protecting their IP and trade secrets, as well as setting aside funds for any legal challenges.
Such tax breaks are bound to yield a return for the government in terms of safeguarding jobs and increased tax revenues, overall it is a win win for all involved. The competition coming from the far east is a reality that is quickly catching up with the western economies, and the protection of IP and trade secrets is of great concern to governments in the west.
In the recent visit of the Chinese premier to the United States, the protection of IP was one of the key agenda items that was discussed. Nevertheless, the governments in North America and Western Europe need to be seen to play an active role and continue dialogue with various industries on the best way forward to achieve IP and trade secrets protection.